Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Will Orel Hershiser ever be a Hall of Famer?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

sjm76

Active member
Joined
Feb 27, 2020
Messages
202
Reaction score
26





Career highlights and awards

He obviously had a pretty impressive career especially the 59 consecutive scoreless innings streak but seemed to tail off over the last half of his career. He also pitched very well when the Dodgers were in the postseason and had 204 wins. I believe he is next eligible in 2022 with the Veteran's committee. Do you think he ever gets in?
 

Letch77

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2018
Messages
1,608
Reaction score
353
Location
Midwest
Probably...the "today's game" committee meets twice every five years and sooner or later they're going to run low on viable candidates that are ahead of the steroid users.
 

tpeichel

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 10, 2008
Messages
15,639
Reaction score
119
I’m going to say, yes. Hershiser seems pretty similar to Jack Morris.
 

WizardofOz1982

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 30, 2017
Messages
1,826
Reaction score
1,726
Location
Oklahoma
Jack Morris shouldn't have gotten in and Hershiser is quite a bit worse than Morris so I'd say no. That means he'll likely get in the first time he's eligible on a Veteran's Committee ballot.
 

tpeichel

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 10, 2008
Messages
15,639
Reaction score
119
Jack Morris shouldn't have gotten in and Hershiser is quite a bit worse than Morris so I'd say no. That means he'll likely get in the first time he's eligible on a Veteran's Committee ballot.

How is Hershiser quite a bit worse? To be honest I didn’t do a deep dive, but Hershiser has a better ERA, 3.48, and a much better WAR, plus the Cy Young, which I thought balanced out the pluses that Morris has.

Morris was great in the postseason, but so was Hershiser going 8-3 with a 2.59 ERA.
 

bstanwood

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
3,666
Reaction score
332
Location
Mystic, CT
I feel like the bulldog didn't have a long enough peak, he played for awhile and was good for most of it but he was elite for a shorter time than I'd like to see from that elite level. I think his coaching will play an impact, from what I can see he is a very solid pitching coach and if he were ever to manage successfully I think that would do it.
 

banjar

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2015
Messages
2,899
Reaction score
1,302
Location
Lafayette, Colorado
Hershiser had an amazing peak, up there with the all-timers. But it just didn't last long enough. First ballot hall of very good, but I just don't see him squeaking into the HOF. But with the veterans committee, who knows.
 

gt2590

Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
40,067
Reaction score
5,035
Location
Near Philly
No.

Like Johan Santana, Barry Zito, Mike Scott, Dwight Golden, guys like that who had tremendous coupla seasons but not enough overall success. Corey Kluber and Johnny Cueto are recent similar examples...
 

WizardofOz1982

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 30, 2017
Messages
1,826
Reaction score
1,726
Location
Oklahoma
How is Hershiser quite a bit worse? To be honest I didn’t do a deep dive, but Hershiser has a better ERA, 3.48, and a much better WAR, plus the Cy Young, which I thought balanced out the pluses that Morris has.

Morris was great in the postseason, but so was Hershiser going 8-3 with a 2.59 ERA.

They're closer by FIP than ERA (3.69 to 3.94). Morris has 55.8 career fWAR compared to Hershiser's 48.0 though a lot of that is innings difference.

Quite a bit worse was too strong after looking again but Morris had a higher peak as well as a more extended one. Hershiser had 6 good to great years and the rest were league average or so in 17 seasons. Morris had 10 good to great years and the rest were league average or better.

I look at awards well down the list of qualifications. Then i take a look at the season and see if the award was really deserved or not. Hershiser wasn't the best pitcher on the Dodgers in 1988 much less the National League. Gooden or Cone (my vote would have been Cone) should have walked away with the 1988 Cy Young easily but didn't. Cone finished 3rd and Gooden didn't get a single vote. The 15 shutouts likely won it for Hershiser and I can see why but he wasn't the most valuable pitcher that season. Usually it is a player on a winning team, etc. but even that doesn't hold water. The Mets were the best team in baseball in 1988.

They really aren't that dissimilar I guess, at least on an individual talent level basis. Hershiser just didn't sustain his peak long enough. Starting at 25, rather than 22 like Morris, didn't help I'm sure.
 

tpeichel

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 10, 2008
Messages
15,639
Reaction score
119
They're closer by FIP than ERA (3.69 to 3.94). Morris has 55.8 career fWAR compared to Hershiser's 48.0 though a lot of that is innings difference.

Quite a bit worse was too strong after looking again but Morris had a higher peak as well as a more extended one. Hershiser had 6 good to great years and the rest were league average or so in 17 seasons. Morris had 10 good to great years and the rest were league average or better.

I look at awards well down the list of qualifications. Then i take a look at the season and see if the award was really deserved or not. Hershiser wasn't the best pitcher on the Dodgers in 1988 much less the National League. Gooden or Cone (my vote would have been Cone) should have walked away with the 1988 Cy Young easily but didn't. Cone finished 3rd and Gooden didn't get a single vote. The 15 shutouts likely won it for Hershiser and I can see why but he wasn't the most valuable pitcher that season. Usually it is a player on a winning team, etc. but even that doesn't hold water. The Mets were the best team in baseball in 1988.

They really aren't that dissimilar I guess, at least on an individual talent level basis. Hershiser just didn't sustain his peak long enough. Starting at 25, rather than 22 like Morris, didn't help I'm sure.

Good deep dive on the analysis.

The voters that felt good about putting in Jack Morris will likely have similar good feelings about Hershiser, though maybe that Game 7 in 1991 was really memorable for the voters and that will be the difference.
 

WizardofOz1982

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 30, 2017
Messages
1,826
Reaction score
1,726
Location
Oklahoma
Good deep dive on the analysis.

The voters that felt good about putting in Jack Morris will likely have similar good feelings about Hershiser, though maybe that Game 7 in 1991 was really memorable for the voters and that will be the difference.

Morris also had the Winningest pitcher of the 80s thing going for him. I'm not sure that Hershiser has the kind of narrative to support him getting in like that. Maybe the 59 inning shutout streak gets him there along with the Cy Young and the Postseason awards. He wouldn't be the worst pitcher in the Hall by quite a bit.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top